fly-brain-bench
Browser LIF over FlyWire (138,639 neurons, ~2.7M connections) at 60 fps with no extra dependencies.
Neurons are simulated — leaky integrate-and-fire or better — with documented, tuned parameters.
Dispute this rating →The evidence
No evidence, no level.LIF constants follow Shiu et al. 2024 and the integration is the closed-form solution of the two-variable system.
https://github.com/RaphaelSR/fly-brain-bench/blob/d291d26967ff090f3bb0531209627a93d6d61993/web/js/sim.worker.js#L1-L18The per-step integrate/threshold/reset loop reads the connectome weights and never writes them.
https://github.com/RaphaelSR/fly-brain-bench/blob/d291d26967ff090f3bb0531209627a93d6d61993/web/js/sim.worker.js#L48-L90The author states the in-browser training fits the readout, not the brain, and that no synapse changes.
https://github.com/RaphaelSR/fly-brain-bench/blob/d291d26967ff090f3bb0531209627a93d6d61993/README.md#L108The KC->MBON depression is a one-shot multiplicative edit between two probes in an analysis script, not an update that runs during the simulation.
https://github.com/RaphaelSR/fly-brain-bench/blob/d291d26967ff090f3bb0531209627a93d6d61993/tools/19_isolated_mb.py#L61-L75The author's own negative result on why dopaminergic depression does not produce odour learning in this model.
https://github.com/RaphaelSR/fly-brain-bench/blob/d291d26967ff090f3bb0531209627a93d6d61993/README.md#L110-L126
Leaky integrate-and-fire over real FlyWire data shipped with the page, using the Shiu et al. 2024 constants and a closed-form two-variable integration, with an event-driven active set - a documented neuron model, so L1. Not L2: the simulation never writes a weight. The in-browser 'teaching' feature fits a multinomial logistic regression over 58 descending/motor cell-type rates by gradient descent, and the README states in its own words that this trains the readout, not the brain, and that no synapse changes. The repo does contain a mushroom-body plasticity experiment (tools/19_isolated_mb.py) that depresses real KC->MBON edges to 25% for the Kenyon cells active during the conditioned odour and re-probes; I read it as an offline one-shot perturbation inside an analysis script - no dopamine signal, no update during a run, no effect on the shipped simulation - rather than a plasticity rule the model runs, which is why it does not lift this to L2. The author's negative result from that script is the most valuable thing on the page: the model's Kenyon-cell code is 60.7% active with 99.3% overlap across different odours, so dopaminergic depression cannot produce odour-specific learning here.
Record
Nearby
All projects →MaleCNS simulation connected to ViZDoom through modeled visual inputs and a fixed button readout. Includes plasticity experiments and negative validation results; learned survival has not been demonstrated.
Research framework comparing a MaleCNS-constrained sparse recurrent controller with rewired graphs, conventional neural networks, and other controls on simple VizDoom tasks.
Ratings on thelearningfly.com are proposals, not verdicts. Every one of them is arguable in public.